Indonesia’s entry into BRICS—an influential coalition of Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa—marks a bold and timely maneuver on the global economic chessboard. It signals not just a desire for deeper collaboration with emerging powers but a calculated pursuit of long-term national interests in investment, industrial downstreaming, and geopolitical relevance.
Unlocking Investment through Downstreaming
At the heart of Indonesia’s economic strategy lies its ambitious downstreaming agenda. Currently targeting 15 key commodities, the country aims to shift from raw material exports to high-value industrial processing. Among the standout opportunities is cobalt, a vital element in the production of electric vehicle (EV) batteries. With an estimated 600,000 tons of reserves—the third-largest in the world—Indonesia is well-positioned to become a global hub for producing precursors, the critical blend of nickel, cobalt, and manganese used in lithium-ion battery cathodes.
Membership in BRICS opens the door to strategic investments and technology transfers from fellow member nations, particularly China and India, which are aggressively expanding their EV markets. Furthermore, synergies with Brazil—another resource-rich nation—could unlock collaboration in the fisheries sector, where Indonesia ranks among the world’s top three in marine resources and leads in tuna production.
The Power and Promise of BRICS
BRICS is more than an acronym—it is an economic powerhouse. Together, its members represent over 40% of the global population, contribute more than 25% of global GDP, and account for 20% of international trade. This collective clout offers Indonesia a valuable platform to amplify its voice on global issues such as climate change, food security, and economic reform.
Crucially, BRICS offers access to alternative financing through the New Development Bank (NDB) which has committed up to USD 200 billion for development and emergency needs across member states. In an era of tightening global capital and increasing geopolitical fragmentation, this access is not only strategic but potentially transformative.
Risks and Realities
Indonesia’s move is not without complications. Several risks must be navigated with foresight:
-
Power Imbalance:
China and Russia’s outsized influence within BRICS may limit Indonesia’s decision-making role unless it adopts an assertive diplomatic stance. -
Strained Western Relations:
Alignment with BRICS may be viewed skeptically by Western partners, potentially complicating Indonesia’s trade or diplomatic relations with the U.S. and EU. -
Institutional Weakness:
Unlike the European Union, BRICS lacks strong institutional cohesion, making policy alignment and enforcement inconsistent. -
Reputational Risk:
Association with member states facing sanctions or political instability could present image challenges for Indonesia’s broader global brand.
Conclusion
Indonesia’s decision to join BRICS is more than symbolic; it is a strategic declaration of intent. It reflects a vision of greater economic autonomy, diversified partnerships, and stronger positioning in a shifting world order. While the path ahead demands diplomatic finesse and clear-eyed planning, Indonesia has a unique opportunity to evolve from a peripheral player to a central voice in the next era of global cooperation—not merely as a member, but as a leader among emerging economies.